Incomplete BIS testing cannot justify reclassification or confiscatory action; declared customs classification restored and enhanced redemption fine s...
Page of 4824
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96463 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC disposed of the writ petition concerning the non-constitution of the GST Tribunal and the petitioner's request for a stay on recovery proceedings pending appeal. The petitioner had already deposited 10% of the tax demand and agreed to deposit an additional 10% of the remaining amount. In light of the Government of India's circular and the petitioner's undertaking, the court held that the requirements under Section 112(8) of the CGST Act were met. Consequently, recovery of the remaining confirmed demand is stayed pursuant to Section 112(9) of the CGST Act upon the petitioner's compliance with the prescribed pre-deposit conditions. No further directions were deemed necessary, and the writ petition was disposed of accordingly.
The HC disposed of the writ petition concerning the non-constitution of the GST Tribunal and the petitioner's request for a stay on recovery proceedings pending appeal. The petitioner had already deposited 10% of the tax demand and agreed to deposit an additional 10% of the remaining amount. In light of the Government of India's circular and the petitioner's undertaking, the court held that the requirements under Section 112(8) of the CGST Act were met. Consequently, recovery of the remaining confirmed demand is stayed pursuant to Section 112(9) of the CGST Act upon the petitioner's compliance with the prescribed pre-deposit conditions. No further directions were deemed necessary, and the writ petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
