Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
The HC held that the retrospective extension of the time limit to avail input tax credit under sub-section (4) of Section 16 of the CGST Act, as per the Ministry of Finance circular dated 15-10-2024, permits taxpayers to seek rectification of orders passed under Sections 73, 74, 107, or 108 of the CGST Act regarding wrongful input tax credit claims. Pursuant to the special procedure under Section 148, notified on 8-10-2024, rectification applications may be filed within six months from 15-10-2024, i.e., until 15-4-2025. The petitioner was granted leave to file such an application, and the petition was accordingly disposed of.
The HC held that the retrospective extension of the time limit to avail input tax credit under sub-section (4) of Section 16 of the CGST Act, as per the Ministry of Finance circular dated 15-10-2024, permits taxpayers to seek rectification of orders passed under Sections 73, 74, 107, or 108 of the CGST Act regarding wrongful input tax credit claims. Pursuant to the special procedure under Section 148, notified on 8-10-2024, rectification applications may be filed within six months from 15-10-2024, i.e., until 15-4-2025. The petitioner was granted leave to file such an application, and the petition was accordingly disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
