Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that the retrospective extension of the time limit to avail input tax credit under sub-section (4) of Section 16 of the CGST Act, as per the Ministry of Finance circular dated 15-10-2024, permits taxpayers to seek rectification of orders passed under Sections 73, 74, 107, or 108 of the CGST Act regarding wrongful input tax credit claims. Pursuant to the special procedure under Section 148, notified on 8-10-2024, rectification applications may be filed within six months from 15-10-2024, i.e., until 15-4-2025. The petitioner was granted leave to file such an application, and the petition was accordingly disposed of.
The HC held that the retrospective extension of the time limit to avail input tax credit under sub-section (4) of Section 16 of the CGST Act, as per the Ministry of Finance circular dated 15-10-2024, permits taxpayers to seek rectification of orders passed under Sections 73, 74, 107, or 108 of the CGST Act regarding wrongful input tax credit claims. Pursuant to the special procedure under Section 148, notified on 8-10-2024, rectification applications may be filed within six months from 15-10-2024, i.e., until 15-4-2025. The petitioner was granted leave to file such an application, and the petition was accordingly disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
