Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC held that under the unamended Section 54(1) of the Act, the term "a residential house" is not restricted to a single residential unit but may include multiple residential houses. Consequently, the assessee was entitled to claim exemption from capital gains arising from the sale of a single flat by investing the proceeds in the purchase of seven row houses. The court relied on precedents affirming that the provision's language is descriptive of the property type rather than limiting the number of properties acquired. The interpretation favoring the assessee was adopted in line with Supreme Court authority. The appeal was allowed, granting the assessee full exemption under Section 54(1) for the capital gains on the basis of investment in multiple residential properties purchased within the stipulated period.
The HC held that under the unamended Section 54(1) of the Act, the term "a residential house" is not restricted to a single residential unit but may include multiple residential houses. Consequently, the assessee was entitled to claim exemption from capital gains arising from the sale of a single flat by investing the proceeds in the purchase of seven row houses. The court relied on precedents affirming that the provision's language is descriptive of the property type rather than limiting the number of properties acquired. The interpretation favoring the assessee was adopted in line with Supreme Court authority. The appeal was allowed, granting the assessee full exemption under Section 54(1) for the capital gains on the basis of investment in multiple residential properties purchased within the stipulated period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.