Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return filing...
Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT allowed the assessee's claim for proportionate exemption on gratuity and leave encashment received as retirement benefits, recognizing service rendered to the State Government entity from 29.07.1978 to 31.05.2005. The tribunal held that the assessee is entitled to exemption under the relevant provisions for the period of government service despite the assessing officer's initial denial. However, as the jurisdictional AO had not verified the service details, the matter was remitted for fresh verification and examination. The AO is directed to provide the assessee with a reasonable opportunity of hearing and allow the proportionate exemption accordingly. The appeal was disposed of with the grounds allowed for statistical purposes.
The ITAT allowed the assessee's claim for proportionate exemption on gratuity and leave encashment received as retirement benefits, recognizing service rendered to the State Government entity from 29.07.1978 to 31.05.2005. The tribunal held that the assessee is entitled to exemption under the relevant provisions for the period of government service despite the assessing officer's initial denial. However, as the jurisdictional AO had not verified the service details, the matter was remitted for fresh verification and examination. The AO is directed to provide the assessee with a reasonable opportunity of hearing and allow the proportionate exemption accordingly. The appeal was disposed of with the grounds allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.