Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT allowed the assessee's claim for proportionate exemption on gratuity and leave encashment received as retirement benefits, recognizing service rendered to the State Government entity from 29.07.1978 to 31.05.2005. The tribunal held that the assessee is entitled to exemption under the relevant provisions for the period of government service despite the assessing officer's initial denial. However, as the jurisdictional AO had not verified the service details, the matter was remitted for fresh verification and examination. The AO is directed to provide the assessee with a reasonable opportunity of hearing and allow the proportionate exemption accordingly. The appeal was disposed of with the grounds allowed for statistical purposes.
The ITAT allowed the assessee's claim for proportionate exemption on gratuity and leave encashment received as retirement benefits, recognizing service rendered to the State Government entity from 29.07.1978 to 31.05.2005. The tribunal held that the assessee is entitled to exemption under the relevant provisions for the period of government service despite the assessing officer's initial denial. However, as the jurisdictional AO had not verified the service details, the matter was remitted for fresh verification and examination. The AO is directed to provide the assessee with a reasonable opportunity of hearing and allow the proportionate exemption accordingly. The appeal was disposed of with the grounds allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.