Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The CESTAT held that since the appellant, a transit passenger from Bangkok to Dubai via New Delhi, did not cross immigration or pass through the green channel, the Baggage Rules were inapplicable. Consequently, the gold weighing 1215 grams could not be subjected to absolute confiscation under those rules. The tribunal found no merit in the Revenue's objection and identified a suo moto corrigendum order correcting a manifest error on record. The confiscation order was set aside, and no redemption fine or penalty was imposed on the appellant. The appeal was accordingly allowed and disposed of.
The CESTAT held that since the appellant, a transit passenger from Bangkok to Dubai via New Delhi, did not cross immigration or pass through the green channel, the Baggage Rules were inapplicable. Consequently, the gold weighing 1215 grams could not be subjected to absolute confiscation under those rules. The tribunal found no merit in the Revenue's objection and identified a suo moto corrigendum order correcting a manifest error on record. The confiscation order was set aside, and no redemption fine or penalty was imposed on the appellant. The appeal was accordingly allowed and disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.