Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The NCLAT upheld the impugned order dismissing the appeal, finding that the consortium failed to satisfy the prescribed eligibility criteria. The requirement to submit certified true copies of completion or occupancy certificates for projects delivering at least 10 lakh sq. ft. super area was not met, as the LDA had not issued such certificates to the consortium's project despite claims of deemed approval. Additionally, the consortium did not demonstrate availability of the requisite committed funds of Rs. 20 crore as on the effective date; the conditional commitment letter from the bank was insufficient to establish firm fund availability. The tribunal found no error in the rejection of the resolution plan on these grounds, and the appeal was accordingly dismissed.
The NCLAT upheld the impugned order dismissing the appeal, finding that the consortium failed to satisfy the prescribed eligibility criteria. The requirement to submit certified true copies of completion or occupancy certificates for projects delivering at least 10 lakh sq. ft. super area was not met, as the LDA had not issued such certificates to the consortium's project despite claims of deemed approval. Additionally, the consortium did not demonstrate availability of the requisite committed funds of Rs. 20 crore as on the effective date; the conditional commitment letter from the bank was insufficient to establish firm fund availability. The tribunal found no error in the rejection of the resolution plan on these grounds, and the appeal was accordingly dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.