Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The CESTAT held that the supply of electricity and water to the recipients constitutes a sale of goods, not a business support service, and is therefore not subject to service tax. The tribunal observed that business support services pertain to outsourced activities ordinarily performed by the entity itself, which does not include the supply of electricity and water. The demand for service tax for the period 2007-08 to 2014-15 was found unsustainable, particularly for the post-01.07.2012 period where provisions invoked were deleted. Additionally, payment under an incorrect service category does not justify confirmation of demand. Consequently, the service tax demand was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, affirming that the transaction falls outside the ambit of service tax liability.
The CESTAT held that the supply of electricity and water to the recipients constitutes a sale of goods, not a business support service, and is therefore not subject to service tax. The tribunal observed that business support services pertain to outsourced activities ordinarily performed by the entity itself, which does not include the supply of electricity and water. The demand for service tax for the period 2007-08 to 2014-15 was found unsustainable, particularly for the post-01.07.2012 period where provisions invoked were deleted. Additionally, payment under an incorrect service category does not justify confirmation of demand. Consequently, the service tax demand was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, affirming that the transaction falls outside the ambit of service tax liability.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
