Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The HC set aside the impugned suo motu order passed under Section 108 of the Chhattisgarh GST Act, 2017, on grounds of violation of natural justice and lack of jurisdiction at the time of issuance. The Court held that the revisional authority was not validly empowered to pass the order on 01.06.2019, as the relevant notification authorizing such authority was issued only on 07.08.2020. Furthermore, the order failed to provide any cogent reasons or record the requisite satisfaction for exercising revisionary powers, rendering it unsustainable. Consequently, the HC directed the concerned authority to discontinue the revision proceedings forthwith and allowed the petition.
The HC set aside the impugned suo motu order passed under Section 108 of the Chhattisgarh GST Act, 2017, on grounds of violation of natural justice and lack of jurisdiction at the time of issuance. The Court held that the revisional authority was not validly empowered to pass the order on 01.06.2019, as the relevant notification authorizing such authority was issued only on 07.08.2020. Furthermore, the order failed to provide any cogent reasons or record the requisite satisfaction for exercising revisionary powers, rendering it unsustainable. Consequently, the HC directed the concerned authority to discontinue the revision proceedings forthwith and allowed the petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.