Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The HC disposed of the writ petition by quashing the impugned order, acknowledging the petitioner's failure to respond to the notice in DRC 01. The Court, following its prior approach in similar cases, granted relief on terms rather than outright dismissal. The petitioner was directed to deposit 25% of the disputed tax in cash from the Electronic Cash Register within thirty days from receipt of the order. This conditional quashing balances the petitioner's non-compliance with procedural requirements while providing an opportunity to regularize the disputed tax liability.
The HC disposed of the writ petition by quashing the impugned order, acknowledging the petitioner's failure to respond to the notice in DRC 01. The Court, following its prior approach in similar cases, granted relief on terms rather than outright dismissal. The petitioner was directed to deposit 25% of the disputed tax in cash from the Electronic Cash Register within thirty days from receipt of the order. This conditional quashing balances the petitioner's non-compliance with procedural requirements while providing an opportunity to regularize the disputed tax liability.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
