Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
The HC set aside the impugned order dated 12-4-2024 relating to the assessment year 2018-19, which involved a discrepancy between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A. The petitioner was directed to deposit 25% of the disputed tax amount as admitted by counsel for both parties within four weeks from receipt of the order. Upon compliance, the petition was disposed of.
The HC set aside the impugned order dated 12-4-2024 relating to the assessment year 2018-19, which involved a discrepancy between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A. The petitioner was directed to deposit 25% of the disputed tax amount as admitted by counsel for both parties within four weeks from receipt of the order. Upon compliance, the petition was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.