Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
The HC set aside the impugned order dated 12-4-2024 relating to the assessment year 2018-19, which involved a discrepancy between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A. The petitioner was directed to deposit 25% of the disputed tax amount as admitted by counsel for both parties within four weeks from receipt of the order. Upon compliance, the petition was disposed of.
The HC set aside the impugned order dated 12-4-2024 relating to the assessment year 2018-19, which involved a discrepancy between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A. The petitioner was directed to deposit 25% of the disputed tax amount as admitted by counsel for both parties within four weeks from receipt of the order. Upon compliance, the petition was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.