Composite GST notices, mandatory limitation, and same-subject bar: HC upheld valid notices but quashed overlapping proceedings and unauthorised withho...
The HC set aside the impugned order dated 12-4-2024 relating to the assessment year 2018-19, which involved a discrepancy between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A. The petitioner was directed to deposit 25% of the disputed tax amount as admitted by counsel for both parties within four weeks from receipt of the order. Upon compliance, the petition was disposed of.
The HC set aside the impugned order dated 12-4-2024 relating to the assessment year 2018-19, which involved a discrepancy between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A. The petitioner was directed to deposit 25% of the disputed tax amount as admitted by counsel for both parties within four weeks from receipt of the order. Upon compliance, the petition was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.