Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT reversed the disallowance of professional expenses under section 37(1), holding that the assessee discharged the evidentiary burden by furnishing uncontested proof of genuine payments to corporate entities. The failure to serve notice under section 133(6) to third parties did not justify deeming the payments non-genuine. The Tribunal relied on precedents affirming that non-appearance of payees does not warrant adverse inference against the assessee. It was further noted that the assessee operated solely as a commission agent and not as a trader. Consequently, the grounds raised by the assessee were allowed, and the disallowance was set aside.
The ITAT reversed the disallowance of professional expenses under section 37(1), holding that the assessee discharged the evidentiary burden by furnishing uncontested proof of genuine payments to corporate entities. The failure to serve notice under section 133(6) to third parties did not justify deeming the payments non-genuine. The Tribunal relied on precedents affirming that non-appearance of payees does not warrant adverse inference against the assessee. It was further noted that the assessee operated solely as a commission agent and not as a trader. Consequently, the grounds raised by the assessee were allowed, and the disallowance was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.