Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT upheld the exclusion of Cybage Software P. Ltd. and Nihilent Ltd. from the final list of comparables due to lack of segmental revenue data and extraordinary acquisition events, respectively. Sagarsoft (India) Ltd.'s claim as a comparable was rejected based on absence of product development and insufficient evidence of on-site services. Conversely, R Systems Ltd. and Infomile Technologies Ltd. were directed to be included as comparables, the former despite differing financial year-ends and the latter due to functional similarity in software development services. Regarding adjustments for outstanding receivables, the AO/TPO was instructed to verify whether working capital adjustments already account for credit periods, and if so, no separate adjustment for interest on delayed receivables is warranted.
The ITAT upheld the exclusion of Cybage Software P. Ltd. and Nihilent Ltd. from the final list of comparables due to lack of segmental revenue data and extraordinary acquisition events, respectively. Sagarsoft (India) Ltd.'s claim as a comparable was rejected based on absence of product development and insufficient evidence of on-site services. Conversely, R Systems Ltd. and Infomile Technologies Ltd. were directed to be included as comparables, the former despite differing financial year-ends and the latter due to functional similarity in software development services. Regarding adjustments for outstanding receivables, the AO/TPO was instructed to verify whether working capital adjustments already account for credit periods, and if so, no separate adjustment for interest on delayed receivables is warranted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.