Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The ITAT upheld the exclusion of Cybage Software P. Ltd. and Nihilent Ltd. from the final list of comparables due to lack of segmental revenue data and extraordinary acquisition events, respectively. Sagarsoft (India) Ltd.'s claim as a comparable was rejected based on absence of product development and insufficient evidence of on-site services. Conversely, R Systems Ltd. and Infomile Technologies Ltd. were directed to be included as comparables, the former despite differing financial year-ends and the latter due to functional similarity in software development services. Regarding adjustments for outstanding receivables, the AO/TPO was instructed to verify whether working capital adjustments already account for credit periods, and if so, no separate adjustment for interest on delayed receivables is warranted.
The ITAT upheld the exclusion of Cybage Software P. Ltd. and Nihilent Ltd. from the final list of comparables due to lack of segmental revenue data and extraordinary acquisition events, respectively. Sagarsoft (India) Ltd.'s claim as a comparable was rejected based on absence of product development and insufficient evidence of on-site services. Conversely, R Systems Ltd. and Infomile Technologies Ltd. were directed to be included as comparables, the former despite differing financial year-ends and the latter due to functional similarity in software development services. Regarding adjustments for outstanding receivables, the AO/TPO was instructed to verify whether working capital adjustments already account for credit periods, and if so, no separate adjustment for interest on delayed receivables is warranted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.