Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC set aside the Sessions Court's acquittal and allowed the appeal, holding the accused guilty under Section 138 of the NI Act for dishonour of cheque due to insufficient funds. The complainant successfully established the presumption under Section 139 regarding execution and issuance of the cheque, supported by evidence and admission of the accused's signature. The defence's contention that the cheque was issued as security for a daily chitty transaction was unsubstantiated and insufficient to rebut the statutory presumption. Consequently, the accused failed to discharge the burden of proof by a preponderance of probabilities, and the statutory presumption stood unrebutted. The Sessions Court's dismissal of the complaint was thus erroneous, warranting interference and conviction of the accused for the offence under the NI Act.
The HC set aside the Sessions Court's acquittal and allowed the appeal, holding the accused guilty under Section 138 of the NI Act for dishonour of cheque due to insufficient funds. The complainant successfully established the presumption under Section 139 regarding execution and issuance of the cheque, supported by evidence and admission of the accused's signature. The defence's contention that the cheque was issued as security for a daily chitty transaction was unsubstantiated and insufficient to rebut the statutory presumption. Consequently, the accused failed to discharge the burden of proof by a preponderance of probabilities, and the statutory presumption stood unrebutted. The Sessions Court's dismissal of the complaint was thus erroneous, warranting interference and conviction of the accused for the offence under the NI Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
