Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
A federal agency filed a case against a Bengaluru-based credit payment app company for violating foreign direct investment (FDI) rules by receiving over Rs 913 crore without required government approvals. The company obtained FDI under the automatic route and issued convertible notes without prior government consent, contrary to the Foreign Exchange Management Act. Although the company declared its business as information technology services, its financial activities required FDI approval under the 100 percent approval route. The agency's investigation revealed the company received Rs 648 crore in FDI and issued convertible notes worth Rs 264 crore without the necessary government permissions, rendering it liable for legal proceedings under foreign exchange regulations.
A federal agency filed a case against a Bengaluru-based credit payment app company for violating foreign direct investment (FDI) rules by receiving over Rs 913 crore without required government approvals. The company obtained FDI under the automatic route and issued convertible notes without prior government consent, contrary to the Foreign Exchange Management Act. Although the company declared its business as information technology services, its financial activities required FDI approval under the 100 percent approval route. The agency's investigation revealed the company received Rs 648 crore in FDI and issued convertible notes worth Rs 264 crore without the necessary government permissions, rendering it liable for legal proceedings under foreign exchange regulations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
