Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The HC quashed the impugned order dated 15.02.2025, which had assessed the petitioner to pay higher tax based on erroneous GSTR-9 figures and incorrect taxable value. The petitioner is directed to deposit the admitted tax liability of Rs. 2,00,000 within 30 days from receipt of the order and file a reply to the show cause notice within the prescribed time. The impugned order shall be treated as an addendum to the show cause notice. The matter is remanded to the respondents for passing a fresh order. The petitioner retains the right to seek rectification under Section 161 of the GST Act. The petition is disposed of accordingly.
The HC quashed the impugned order dated 15.02.2025, which had assessed the petitioner to pay higher tax based on erroneous GSTR-9 figures and incorrect taxable value. The petitioner is directed to deposit the admitted tax liability of Rs. 2,00,000 within 30 days from receipt of the order and file a reply to the show cause notice within the prescribed time. The impugned order shall be treated as an addendum to the show cause notice. The matter is remanded to the respondents for passing a fresh order. The petitioner retains the right to seek rectification under Section 161 of the GST Act. The petition is disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
