Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
The HC quashed the impugned order dated 15.02.2025, which had assessed the petitioner to pay higher tax based on erroneous GSTR-9 figures and incorrect taxable value. The petitioner is directed to deposit the admitted tax liability of Rs. 2,00,000 within 30 days from receipt of the order and file a reply to the show cause notice within the prescribed time. The impugned order shall be treated as an addendum to the show cause notice. The matter is remanded to the respondents for passing a fresh order. The petitioner retains the right to seek rectification under Section 161 of the GST Act. The petition is disposed of accordingly.
The HC quashed the impugned order dated 15.02.2025, which had assessed the petitioner to pay higher tax based on erroneous GSTR-9 figures and incorrect taxable value. The petitioner is directed to deposit the admitted tax liability of Rs. 2,00,000 within 30 days from receipt of the order and file a reply to the show cause notice within the prescribed time. The impugned order shall be treated as an addendum to the show cause notice. The matter is remanded to the respondents for passing a fresh order. The petitioner retains the right to seek rectification under Section 161 of the GST Act. The petition is disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
