Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of additions made under section 69A relating to alleged unaccounted income and unexplained cash deposits. The tribunal found the AO's quantum of addition flawed, as it failed to consider higher income already offered by the assessee in earlier years, resulting in no further addition for the relevant assessment year. The revenue did not demonstrate any error in the CIT(A)'s reliance on the AO's own findings and tables, nor did it dispute the assessee's earlier income declarations exceeding the AO's estimated addition. Regarding unexplained cash deposits, the ITAT accepted the assessee's books of account showing sufficient cash availability prior to deposits and found no evidence that cash shown was non-existent or diverted. Consequently, additions on both counts were deleted, and the appeal was decided against the revenue, affirming the correctness of the CIT(A)'s orders.
The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of additions made under section 69A relating to alleged unaccounted income and unexplained cash deposits. The tribunal found the AO's quantum of addition flawed, as it failed to consider higher income already offered by the assessee in earlier years, resulting in no further addition for the relevant assessment year. The revenue did not demonstrate any error in the CIT(A)'s reliance on the AO's own findings and tables, nor did it dispute the assessee's earlier income declarations exceeding the AO's estimated addition. Regarding unexplained cash deposits, the ITAT accepted the assessee's books of account showing sufficient cash availability prior to deposits and found no evidence that cash shown was non-existent or diverted. Consequently, additions on both counts were deleted, and the appeal was decided against the revenue, affirming the correctness of the CIT(A)'s orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.