Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The CESTAT set aside the demand of service tax on sale of sweet boxes, holding it as a pure sale of goods not liable to service tax. The levy of service tax under Manpower supply services received from M/s Sonu Services was also quashed, as the tax was already paid by the service provider, and double taxation under RCM was disallowed. Service tax demand on remuneration paid to four directors was negated, recognizing director remuneration as salary exempt from service tax under Section 65B(44)(b) of the Finance Act, 1994. The disallowance of CENVAT credit of Rs.21,250/- on maintenance services was reversed, acknowledging credit eligibility under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Reversal of CENVAT credit on grounds of non-payment under RCM was rejected since tax was paid by the provider. Penalties imposed were also set aside due to non-sustainability of the demands. The appeal was allowed in full.
The CESTAT set aside the demand of service tax on sale of sweet boxes, holding it as a pure sale of goods not liable to service tax. The levy of service tax under Manpower supply services received from M/s Sonu Services was also quashed, as the tax was already paid by the service provider, and double taxation under RCM was disallowed. Service tax demand on remuneration paid to four directors was negated, recognizing director remuneration as salary exempt from service tax under Section 65B(44)(b) of the Finance Act, 1994. The disallowance of CENVAT credit of Rs.21,250/- on maintenance services was reversed, acknowledging credit eligibility under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Reversal of CENVAT credit on grounds of non-payment under RCM was rejected since tax was paid by the provider. Penalties imposed were also set aside due to non-sustainability of the demands. The appeal was allowed in full.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.