Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The CESTAT set aside the demand of service tax on sale of sweet boxes, holding it as a pure sale of goods not liable to service tax. The levy of service tax under Manpower supply services received from M/s Sonu Services was also quashed, as the tax was already paid by the service provider, and double taxation under RCM was disallowed. Service tax demand on remuneration paid to four directors was negated, recognizing director remuneration as salary exempt from service tax under Section 65B(44)(b) of the Finance Act, 1994. The disallowance of CENVAT credit of Rs.21,250/- on maintenance services was reversed, acknowledging credit eligibility under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Reversal of CENVAT credit on grounds of non-payment under RCM was rejected since tax was paid by the provider. Penalties imposed were also set aside due to non-sustainability of the demands. The appeal was allowed in full.
The CESTAT set aside the demand of service tax on sale of sweet boxes, holding it as a pure sale of goods not liable to service tax. The levy of service tax under Manpower supply services received from M/s Sonu Services was also quashed, as the tax was already paid by the service provider, and double taxation under RCM was disallowed. Service tax demand on remuneration paid to four directors was negated, recognizing director remuneration as salary exempt from service tax under Section 65B(44)(b) of the Finance Act, 1994. The disallowance of CENVAT credit of Rs.21,250/- on maintenance services was reversed, acknowledging credit eligibility under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Reversal of CENVAT credit on grounds of non-payment under RCM was rejected since tax was paid by the provider. Penalties imposed were also set aside due to non-sustainability of the demands. The appeal was allowed in full.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
