Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
The High Court set aside the impugned order which upheld the demand and penalty solely on the ground of delayed filing of GSTR-3B returns for FY 2017-18 to 2020-21 under Section 39 of the GST Act. Without adjudicating on the merits, the matter was remanded to the Superintendent, CGST & Central Excise Range-I, Division Ratlam for fresh adjudication in light of changed circumstances. The petition was disposed of by remand, directing reconsideration of the case afresh.
The High Court set aside the impugned order which upheld the demand and penalty solely on the ground of delayed filing of GSTR-3B returns for FY 2017-18 to 2020-21 under Section 39 of the GST Act. Without adjudicating on the merits, the matter was remanded to the Superintendent, CGST & Central Excise Range-I, Division Ratlam for fresh adjudication in light of changed circumstances. The petition was disposed of by remand, directing reconsideration of the case afresh.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
