Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC upheld the interim injunction restraining the defendants from representing themselves as shareholders, directors, or agents of the plaintiff company and from dealing with its assets. The court found prima facie evidence of collusion to undervalue and sell company properties, causing potential irreparable harm to the plaintiffs. It emphasized that interlocutory relief aims to preserve the status quo until final adjudication, requiring judicial discretion based on comparative inconvenience. The court rejected the defendants' claim of improved rights or new evidence of forgery, affirming the plaintiffs as de facto directors managing the company. Consequently, any sale of the company's landed assets must be conducted at prevailing market rates, with full disclosure of sale details to the court. The application for modification was disposed of accordingly.
The HC upheld the interim injunction restraining the defendants from representing themselves as shareholders, directors, or agents of the plaintiff company and from dealing with its assets. The court found prima facie evidence of collusion to undervalue and sell company properties, causing potential irreparable harm to the plaintiffs. It emphasized that interlocutory relief aims to preserve the status quo until final adjudication, requiring judicial discretion based on comparative inconvenience. The court rejected the defendants' claim of improved rights or new evidence of forgery, affirming the plaintiffs as de facto directors managing the company. Consequently, any sale of the company's landed assets must be conducted at prevailing market rates, with full disclosure of sale details to the court. The application for modification was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
