Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income was unsustainable where the assessee voluntarily disclosed additional income in returns filed under section 148 during assessment proceedings. The Tribunal observed absence of incriminating evidence or suppression, acceptance of revised returns by the AO without adverse inference, and reliance on precedents affirming that mere surrender of income or disallowance without concealment does not attract penalty. Furthermore, the AO failed to record satisfaction under either limb of section 271(1)(c), rendering the penalty proceedings invalid. Consequently, the penalty imposed for all five assessment years was quashed and the assessee's appeal allowed.
The ITAT held that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income was unsustainable where the assessee voluntarily disclosed additional income in returns filed under section 148 during assessment proceedings. The Tribunal observed absence of incriminating evidence or suppression, acceptance of revised returns by the AO without adverse inference, and reliance on precedents affirming that mere surrender of income or disallowance without concealment does not attract penalty. Furthermore, the AO failed to record satisfaction under either limb of section 271(1)(c), rendering the penalty proceedings invalid. Consequently, the penalty imposed for all five assessment years was quashed and the assessee's appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.