Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that reopening an assessment under section 147 against a deceased assessee is invalid when the legal representatives have informed the department of the death. Despite the assessee's death being notified with supporting evidence years prior, the AO continued proceedings and passed the assessment order in the name of the deceased, which is impermissible. The tribunal emphasized that no valid assessment can be framed against a deceased person once the fact of death is known to the AO. Consequently, the assessment order issued nearly eight years post-mortem was declared void ab initio. The ITAT set aside the assessment order and allowed the appeal, reinforcing that reopening notices issued to deceased assessees are nullities and any resultant proceedings must be quashed.
The ITAT held that reopening an assessment under section 147 against a deceased assessee is invalid when the legal representatives have informed the department of the death. Despite the assessee's death being notified with supporting evidence years prior, the AO continued proceedings and passed the assessment order in the name of the deceased, which is impermissible. The tribunal emphasized that no valid assessment can be framed against a deceased person once the fact of death is known to the AO. Consequently, the assessment order issued nearly eight years post-mortem was declared void ab initio. The ITAT set aside the assessment order and allowed the appeal, reinforcing that reopening notices issued to deceased assessees are nullities and any resultant proceedings must be quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.