Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT set aside the additions made by the AO under sections 68 and 69C relating to unexplained cash credits, bogus commission, and bogus interest on unsecured loans, as the assessee had repaid the loans in the subsequent year and the department had accepted such repayments without making additions. The AO's reliance on unrecorded statements under section 131 and failure to demonstrate escaped income or assets as required under the fourth proviso to section 153A for reopening assessments beyond six years rendered the reassessment invalid. Since the AO did not fulfill statutory conditions for invoking extended limitation under section 153A for the eighth assessment year from the search year, the reopening was held without jurisdiction. Consequently, the ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, quashing the additions and the reassessment proceedings.
The ITAT set aside the additions made by the AO under sections 68 and 69C relating to unexplained cash credits, bogus commission, and bogus interest on unsecured loans, as the assessee had repaid the loans in the subsequent year and the department had accepted such repayments without making additions. The AO's reliance on unrecorded statements under section 131 and failure to demonstrate escaped income or assets as required under the fourth proviso to section 153A for reopening assessments beyond six years rendered the reassessment invalid. Since the AO did not fulfill statutory conditions for invoking extended limitation under section 153A for the eighth assessment year from the search year, the reopening was held without jurisdiction. Consequently, the ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, quashing the additions and the reassessment proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.