Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The CESTAT set aside the penalties imposed under Sections...
Penalties under Sections 114(iii) and 117 Customs Act quashed due to lack of evidence; negligence proceedings directed under Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The CESTAT set aside the penalties imposed under Sections 114(iii) and 117 of the Customs Act, 1962, on the appellant for allegedly exporting waste clothes disguised as ladies' scarves to claim duty drawback. The tribunal noted that the Commissioner's own findings indicated no evidence of abetment, omission, or contravention warranting confiscation or penalty under the cited provisions. Since the prerequisites for imposing penalties under Sections 114(iii) and 117 were not met, the penalties were held unsustainable and consequently quashed. However, the appellant was found guilty of negligence attracting action under the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013, and the department was directed to initiate appropriate proceedings under those regulations. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty of Rs. 25,000 imposed under Section 114(iii) and the penalty under Section 117 were set aside.
The CESTAT set aside the penalties imposed under Sections 114(iii) and 117 of the Customs Act, 1962, on the appellant for allegedly exporting waste clothes disguised as ladies' scarves to claim duty drawback. The tribunal noted that the Commissioner's own findings indicated no evidence of abetment, omission, or contravention warranting confiscation or penalty under the cited provisions. Since the prerequisites for imposing penalties under Sections 114(iii) and 117 were not met, the penalties were held unsustainable and consequently quashed. However, the appellant was found guilty of negligence attracting action under the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013, and the department was directed to initiate appropriate proceedings under those regulations. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty of Rs. 25,000 imposed under Section 114(iii) and the penalty under Section 117 were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
