Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Clause 448 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, establishes a penalty equal to the amount of tax not deducted or paid for failures related to tax deduction at source (TDS), replacing and consolidating provisions under Section 271C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It applies to failures to deduct tax under Chapter XIX-B or to pay or ensure payment as specified in certain notes of the Bill. The penalty is imposed by the Assessing Officer, who has discretionary power, though the clause lacks explicit reference to a "reasonable cause" defense available under the current law. Compared to Section 271C, Clause 448 streamlines scope through broader chapter references and tables, potentially increasing administrative efficiency but raising concerns about interpretative clarity and fairness. The provision aims to strengthen enforcement and deterrence but may expose taxpayers to stricter penalties for inadvertent defaults unless further clarifications or safeguards are introduced.
Clause 448 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, establishes a penalty equal to the amount of tax not deducted or paid for failures related to tax deduction at source (TDS), replacing and consolidating provisions under Section 271C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It applies to failures to deduct tax under Chapter XIX-B or to pay or ensure payment as specified in certain notes of the Bill. The penalty is imposed by the Assessing Officer, who has discretionary power, though the clause lacks explicit reference to a "reasonable cause" defense available under the current law. Compared to Section 271C, Clause 448 streamlines scope through broader chapter references and tables, potentially increasing administrative efficiency but raising concerns about interpretative clarity and fairness. The provision aims to strengthen enforcement and deterrence but may expose taxpayers to stricter penalties for inadvertent defaults unless further clarifications or safeguards are introduced.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.