Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
Clause 448 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, establishes a penalty equal to the amount of tax not deducted or paid for failures related to tax deduction at source (TDS), replacing and consolidating provisions under Section 271C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It applies to failures to deduct tax under Chapter XIX-B or to pay or ensure payment as specified in certain notes of the Bill. The penalty is imposed by the Assessing Officer, who has discretionary power, though the clause lacks explicit reference to a "reasonable cause" defense available under the current law. Compared to Section 271C, Clause 448 streamlines scope through broader chapter references and tables, potentially increasing administrative efficiency but raising concerns about interpretative clarity and fairness. The provision aims to strengthen enforcement and deterrence but may expose taxpayers to stricter penalties for inadvertent defaults unless further clarifications or safeguards are introduced.
Clause 448 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, establishes a penalty equal to the amount of tax not deducted or paid for failures related to tax deduction at source (TDS), replacing and consolidating provisions under Section 271C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It applies to failures to deduct tax under Chapter XIX-B or to pay or ensure payment as specified in certain notes of the Bill. The penalty is imposed by the Assessing Officer, who has discretionary power, though the clause lacks explicit reference to a "reasonable cause" defense available under the current law. Compared to Section 271C, Clause 448 streamlines scope through broader chapter references and tables, potentially increasing administrative efficiency but raising concerns about interpretative clarity and fairness. The provision aims to strengthen enforcement and deterrence but may expose taxpayers to stricter penalties for inadvertent defaults unless further clarifications or safeguards are introduced.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
