Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT held that the addition of capital gains income in AY 2015-16 was unsustainable as the original transfer of land by the assessee and family members to TTCIPL occurred on 19.04.2010 and was already assessed for AY 2011-12. The subsequent sale deed dated 16.03.2015, involving the same land and survey number, represented a sale by the original buyer, not a fresh transfer by the assessee. The assessee's name appearing in the later deed only confirmed the chain of title and did not trigger new capital gains liability. The Tribunal noted inconsistent treatment by the Revenue in similar cases and found no basis for reassessment under Section 147 for the later year. Consequently, the capital gains addition for AY 2015-16 was deleted and the assessee's appeal allowed.
The ITAT held that the addition of capital gains income in AY 2015-16 was unsustainable as the original transfer of land by the assessee and family members to TTCIPL occurred on 19.04.2010 and was already assessed for AY 2011-12. The subsequent sale deed dated 16.03.2015, involving the same land and survey number, represented a sale by the original buyer, not a fresh transfer by the assessee. The assessee's name appearing in the later deed only confirmed the chain of title and did not trigger new capital gains liability. The Tribunal noted inconsistent treatment by the Revenue in similar cases and found no basis for reassessment under Section 147 for the later year. Consequently, the capital gains addition for AY 2015-16 was deleted and the assessee's appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
