Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT allowed the assessee's application under Rule 29 to admit additional evidence relating to the bona fide nature and agreed price of shares acquired in an off-market transaction. The tribunal acknowledged that the AO applied section 56(2)(x) deeming income based on the difference between the aggregate FMV and consideration paid, resulting in a substantial addition. Given the anti-abuse intent of section 56(2)(x) and the pending identical issue before the CIT(A) for other promoters, the ITAT emphasized the importance of evaluating the newly submitted evidence. Consequently, the matter was remanded to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication on merits, ensuring the assessee is not prejudiced by earlier non-filing of material information, and to ascertain the correct valuation and applicability of section 56(2)(x).
The ITAT allowed the assessee's application under Rule 29 to admit additional evidence relating to the bona fide nature and agreed price of shares acquired in an off-market transaction. The tribunal acknowledged that the AO applied section 56(2)(x) deeming income based on the difference between the aggregate FMV and consideration paid, resulting in a substantial addition. Given the anti-abuse intent of section 56(2)(x) and the pending identical issue before the CIT(A) for other promoters, the ITAT emphasized the importance of evaluating the newly submitted evidence. Consequently, the matter was remanded to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication on merits, ensuring the assessee is not prejudiced by earlier non-filing of material information, and to ascertain the correct valuation and applicability of section 56(2)(x).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.