Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The Supreme Court upheld the CESTAT Chennai's classification of the imported Optical Power Ground Wire Fibre Cable (OPGW) under Customs Tariff Heading 8544 and its accessories under Heading 853670, rejecting classification under Headings 9001 and 7616. The Court affirmed that the denial of exemption was improper and declined to interfere with the tribunal's findings. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the correctness of the tribunal's classification and the applicability of the relevant Board's Circular.
The Supreme Court upheld the CESTAT Chennai's classification of the imported Optical Power Ground Wire Fibre Cable (OPGW) under Customs Tariff Heading 8544 and its accessories under Heading 853670, rejecting classification under Headings 9001 and 7616. The Court affirmed that the denial of exemption was improper and declined to interfere with the tribunal's findings. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the correctness of the tribunal's classification and the applicability of the relevant Board's Circular.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.