Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The HC held that the impugned order was passed in violation of natural justice principles, as the respondent failed to provide the petitioner a personal hearing despite receiving a detailed 130-page reply. The Court emphasized the mandatory requirement under Section 75(4) of the TNGST Act, 2017, for affording an opportunity of personal hearing before passing such orders. Consequently, the HC set aside the impugned order dated 26.09.2024 and remanded the matter to the respondent for fresh consideration, directing that the petitioner be given a personal hearing to present their case on merits. The petition was allowed by way of remand.
The HC held that the impugned order was passed in violation of natural justice principles, as the respondent failed to provide the petitioner a personal hearing despite receiving a detailed 130-page reply. The Court emphasized the mandatory requirement under Section 75(4) of the TNGST Act, 2017, for affording an opportunity of personal hearing before passing such orders. Consequently, the HC set aside the impugned order dated 26.09.2024 and remanded the matter to the respondent for fresh consideration, directing that the petitioner be given a personal hearing to present their case on merits. The petition was allowed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
