Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The HC held that the impugned order was passed in violation of natural justice principles, as the respondent failed to provide the petitioner a personal hearing despite receiving a detailed 130-page reply. The Court emphasized the mandatory requirement under Section 75(4) of the TNGST Act, 2017, for affording an opportunity of personal hearing before passing such orders. Consequently, the HC set aside the impugned order dated 26.09.2024 and remanded the matter to the respondent for fresh consideration, directing that the petitioner be given a personal hearing to present their case on merits. The petition was allowed by way of remand.
The HC held that the impugned order was passed in violation of natural justice principles, as the respondent failed to provide the petitioner a personal hearing despite receiving a detailed 130-page reply. The Court emphasized the mandatory requirement under Section 75(4) of the TNGST Act, 2017, for affording an opportunity of personal hearing before passing such orders. Consequently, the HC set aside the impugned order dated 26.09.2024 and remanded the matter to the respondent for fresh consideration, directing that the petitioner be given a personal hearing to present their case on merits. The petition was allowed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
