Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of additions under section 68 relating to unsecured loans, finding the assessee satisfactorily proved the identity and creditworthiness of lenders and genuineness of transactions, supported by banking channel evidence and legal precedents. The tribunal confirmed that denial of cross-examination rendered the AO's additions unsustainable. Consequently, disallowance of interest on such loans and alleged commission payments were also deleted. The reassessment order under section 147 was quashed as the AO exceeded jurisdiction by making additions beyond the reasons recorded. Additions based on uncorroborated WhatsApp chats were deleted, adhering to principles against relying on non-speaking documents without corroborative evidence. The CIT(A)'s confirmation of disallowance of education and health cess expenses under section 40(a)(ii) and disallowance of delayed PF and ESI contributions under section 36(1)(va) was affirmed, following Supreme Court rulings. All revenue appeals were dismissed.
The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of additions under section 68 relating to unsecured loans, finding the assessee satisfactorily proved the identity and creditworthiness of lenders and genuineness of transactions, supported by banking channel evidence and legal precedents. The tribunal confirmed that denial of cross-examination rendered the AO's additions unsustainable. Consequently, disallowance of interest on such loans and alleged commission payments were also deleted. The reassessment order under section 147 was quashed as the AO exceeded jurisdiction by making additions beyond the reasons recorded. Additions based on uncorroborated WhatsApp chats were deleted, adhering to principles against relying on non-speaking documents without corroborative evidence. The CIT(A)'s confirmation of disallowance of education and health cess expenses under section 40(a)(ii) and disallowance of delayed PF and ESI contributions under section 36(1)(va) was affirmed, following Supreme Court rulings. All revenue appeals were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
