Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)'s order and remitted the appeal for fresh adjudication, noting the assessee's failure to adequately respond to penalty notices under section 271DA for violation of section 269ST, relating to receipt of cash exceeding Rs. 2,00,000. The Tribunal observed that the CIT(A) had not disposed of the appeal on merits and condoned the delay in filing the appeal due to the assessee's incarceration, which hindered timely response. The ITAT directed the CIT(A) to provide the assessee a fair opportunity to represent the case and allow the AO to be heard pursuant to rule 46A of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, before passing a reasoned order in accordance with law. The matter is thus remanded to ensure adherence to principles of natural justice and proper consideration of the facts and submissions.
The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)'s order and remitted the appeal for fresh adjudication, noting the assessee's failure to adequately respond to penalty notices under section 271DA for violation of section 269ST, relating to receipt of cash exceeding Rs. 2,00,000. The Tribunal observed that the CIT(A) had not disposed of the appeal on merits and condoned the delay in filing the appeal due to the assessee's incarceration, which hindered timely response. The ITAT directed the CIT(A) to provide the assessee a fair opportunity to represent the case and allow the AO to be heard pursuant to rule 46A of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, before passing a reasoned order in accordance with law. The matter is thus remanded to ensure adherence to principles of natural justice and proper consideration of the facts and submissions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
