Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The HC granted ad interim bail to the petitioner accused of fraudulent availing of fake Input Tax Credit and illegal tax evasion. The petitioner, associated with two firms, allegedly claimed substantial ITC amounts as per GST returns. The investigation is complete, and a complaint has been filed, with the allegations subject to trial. The petitioner has no criminal antecedents and has been in custody for approximately five months. Considering the facts, completed investigation, and legal precedents cited, the court found the petitioner's counsel made a sufficient case for bail. Consequently, the bail application was allowed.
The HC granted ad interim bail to the petitioner accused of fraudulent availing of fake Input Tax Credit and illegal tax evasion. The petitioner, associated with two firms, allegedly claimed substantial ITC amounts as per GST returns. The investigation is complete, and a complaint has been filed, with the allegations subject to trial. The petitioner has no criminal antecedents and has been in custody for approximately five months. Considering the facts, completed investigation, and legal precedents cited, the court found the petitioner's counsel made a sufficient case for bail. Consequently, the bail application was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
