Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC dismissed the writ petition on grounds of inordinate delay exceeding three years from the assessment order. The petitioner conceded receipt of the show cause notice via the common GST portal, confirming knowledge of proceedings under Section 74 of the GST Act. The Court emphasized that under Section 107, the appellate authority may condone delay only up to thirty days beyond the prescribed period. Since the petition was filed well beyond this condonable period, it was held to be non-maintainable. Furthermore, service of notice through the GST portal was deemed valid under Section 169 of the GST Act, negating any claim of non-service. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed for being barred by delay and failure to comply with statutory timelines.
The HC dismissed the writ petition on grounds of inordinate delay exceeding three years from the assessment order. The petitioner conceded receipt of the show cause notice via the common GST portal, confirming knowledge of proceedings under Section 74 of the GST Act. The Court emphasized that under Section 107, the appellate authority may condone delay only up to thirty days beyond the prescribed period. Since the petition was filed well beyond this condonable period, it was held to be non-maintainable. Furthermore, service of notice through the GST portal was deemed valid under Section 169 of the GST Act, negating any claim of non-service. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed for being barred by delay and failure to comply with statutory timelines.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
