Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
501 to 520 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC dismissed the writ petition on grounds of inordinate delay exceeding three years from the assessment order. The petitioner conceded receipt of the show cause notice via the common GST portal, confirming knowledge of proceedings under Section 74 of the GST Act. The Court emphasized that under Section 107, the appellate authority may condone delay only up to thirty days beyond the prescribed period. Since the petition was filed well beyond this condonable period, it was held to be non-maintainable. Furthermore, service of notice through the GST portal was deemed valid under Section 169 of the GST Act, negating any claim of non-service. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed for being barred by delay and failure to comply with statutory timelines.
The HC dismissed the writ petition on grounds of inordinate delay exceeding three years from the assessment order. The petitioner conceded receipt of the show cause notice via the common GST portal, confirming knowledge of proceedings under Section 74 of the GST Act. The Court emphasized that under Section 107, the appellate authority may condone delay only up to thirty days beyond the prescribed period. Since the petition was filed well beyond this condonable period, it was held to be non-maintainable. Furthermore, service of notice through the GST portal was deemed valid under Section 169 of the GST Act, negating any claim of non-service. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed for being barred by delay and failure to comply with statutory timelines.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
