Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The CESTAT allowed the appellant's appeal, setting aside the impugned order that denied interest on the refund of amounts deposited during investigation. It was held that the appellant is entitled to interest from the date of deposit until the refund date. The Tribunal relied on precedents affirming that interest is payable on such refunds and specified the applicable rate at 12% per annum. Consequently, the appellant must be paid interest at 12% from the date of deposit to the date of refund. The appeal was allowed solely on the issue of interest payment, overturning the rejection based on maintainability.
The CESTAT allowed the appellant's appeal, setting aside the impugned order that denied interest on the refund of amounts deposited during investigation. It was held that the appellant is entitled to interest from the date of deposit until the refund date. The Tribunal relied on precedents affirming that interest is payable on such refunds and specified the applicable rate at 12% per annum. Consequently, the appellant must be paid interest at 12% from the date of deposit to the date of refund. The appeal was allowed solely on the issue of interest payment, overturning the rejection based on maintainability.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.