Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Clause 445 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 imposes penalties on registered non-profit organizations that divert income for the benefit of related persons, mirroring and expanding upon Section 271AAE of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It applies when specified income becomes taxable due to misuse of funds, with penalties set at 100% of the diverted amount for the first violation and 200% for subsequent violations. The provision covers direct and indirect benefits to related persons as defined under section 355(i) and grants discretionary power to the Assessing Officer to impose penalties during tax proceedings. Unlike its predecessor, Clause 445 broadly applies to all registered non-profits and links penalties directly to the charging provision under the new Bill. The strict liability nature aims to deter misuse of tax exemptions, though it raises interpretative challenges regarding inadvertent violations and procedural consistency. The provision reflects an evolving legislative approach to ensure accountability and protect the integrity of charitable activities.
Clause 445 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 imposes penalties on registered non-profit organizations that divert income for the benefit of related persons, mirroring and expanding upon Section 271AAE of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It applies when specified income becomes taxable due to misuse of funds, with penalties set at 100% of the diverted amount for the first violation and 200% for subsequent violations. The provision covers direct and indirect benefits to related persons as defined under section 355(i) and grants discretionary power to the Assessing Officer to impose penalties during tax proceedings. Unlike its predecessor, Clause 445 broadly applies to all registered non-profits and links penalties directly to the charging provision under the new Bill. The strict liability nature aims to deter misuse of tax exemptions, though it raises interpretative challenges regarding inadvertent violations and procedural consistency. The provision reflects an evolving legislative approach to ensure accountability and protect the integrity of charitable activities.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.