Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Clause 443 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, modernizes and continues the penalty framework established by Section 271AAC of the Income-tax Act, 1961, targeting undisclosed or inadequately explained income such as cash credits, unexplained investments, money, expenditures, and hundi transactions. It imposes a fixed penalty of 10% on the tax payable for such income, in addition to the tax itself, to deter concealment and promote voluntary compliance. Exceptions apply if the income is disclosed and tax paid within the relevant year, and a bar prevents double penalties for the same income under other provisions. Procedural safeguards ensure due process. While both provisions share similar objectives and structures, Clause 443 updates references and procedural aspects to align with the new Bill. Potential issues include interpretation of "income determined," procedural application, and treatment of bona fide errors. The provision aims to balance deterrence with fairness, relying on effective implementation and judicial interpretation.
Clause 443 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, modernizes and continues the penalty framework established by Section 271AAC of the Income-tax Act, 1961, targeting undisclosed or inadequately explained income such as cash credits, unexplained investments, money, expenditures, and hundi transactions. It imposes a fixed penalty of 10% on the tax payable for such income, in addition to the tax itself, to deter concealment and promote voluntary compliance. Exceptions apply if the income is disclosed and tax paid within the relevant year, and a bar prevents double penalties for the same income under other provisions. Procedural safeguards ensure due process. While both provisions share similar objectives and structures, Clause 443 updates references and procedural aspects to align with the new Bill. Potential issues include interpretation of "income determined," procedural application, and treatment of bona fide errors. The provision aims to balance deterrence with fairness, relying on effective implementation and judicial interpretation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.