Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that, pursuant to the Finance Act, 2021 effective 01.04.2021, all assessment and reassessment proceedings under Section 148 must be conducted exclusively through an automated faceless mechanism, including cases assigned to central charges. Notices issued by the JAO or FAO outside this faceless scheme are invalid. The court reaffirmed the binding precedent that no exceptions exist permitting issuance of notices by JAO post-amendment, emphasizing adherence to Section 151A and Section 153D requirements. Consequently, the impugned reassessment orders issued by JAO were quashed as violative of the statutory framework introduced by the Finance Act, 2021. The question of law regarding the mode of issuance of reassessment notices in central charge cases was answered against the Revenue, affirming that such notices must be issued facelessly, thereby upholding procedural compliance and statutory mandates.
The HC held that, pursuant to the Finance Act, 2021 effective 01.04.2021, all assessment and reassessment proceedings under Section 148 must be conducted exclusively through an automated faceless mechanism, including cases assigned to central charges. Notices issued by the JAO or FAO outside this faceless scheme are invalid. The court reaffirmed the binding precedent that no exceptions exist permitting issuance of notices by JAO post-amendment, emphasizing adherence to Section 151A and Section 153D requirements. Consequently, the impugned reassessment orders issued by JAO were quashed as violative of the statutory framework introduced by the Finance Act, 2021. The question of law regarding the mode of issuance of reassessment notices in central charge cases was answered against the Revenue, affirming that such notices must be issued facelessly, thereby upholding procedural compliance and statutory mandates.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.