Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging the order and connected applications. The appellant sought to restore certain commercial complex assets as their property and restrain the RP and SRA from dealing with them, relying on a settlement agreement dated 30.05.2023. However, the Tribunal upheld that the assets were duly disclosed as belonging to the Corporate Debtor (CD) in the Information Memorandum and confirmed that the Resolution Plan was approved on 19.07.2020. Consequently, the appellant's claim to the assets was rejected. The Tribunal further noted that the SRA is entitled to deal with the assets per Regulation 37(1)(a) of the IBBI (CIRP) Regulations, 2016. The IA for approval of the Resolution Plan was remitted back to the CoC. The prayers to set aside the impugned order were refused and the appeal was dismissed.
The NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging the order and connected applications. The appellant sought to restore certain commercial complex assets as their property and restrain the RP and SRA from dealing with them, relying on a settlement agreement dated 30.05.2023. However, the Tribunal upheld that the assets were duly disclosed as belonging to the Corporate Debtor (CD) in the Information Memorandum and confirmed that the Resolution Plan was approved on 19.07.2020. Consequently, the appellant's claim to the assets was rejected. The Tribunal further noted that the SRA is entitled to deal with the assets per Regulation 37(1)(a) of the IBBI (CIRP) Regulations, 2016. The IA for approval of the Resolution Plan was remitted back to the CoC. The prayers to set aside the impugned order were refused and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
