Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The AT dismissed the appeal, affirming the attachment of properties under PMLA against the appellant, a public servant accused of possessing disproportionate assets. The tribunal held that the ED is not mandated to conduct an independent investigation into the predicate offence, as its role is limited to identifying any obvious flaws in the police/CBI investigation. The attachment complied with the conditions under the second proviso of Section 5(1), considering the appellant's failure to substantiate additional income and the risk of asset alienation. The contention that assets acquired from legal sources cannot be attached was rejected, as illicit funds can be laundered through legal channels. The ED's attachment was proportionate and limited to a fraction of the alleged disproportionate assets, with further attachments pending. The decision upheld the ED's authority and procedural compliance under PMLA, dismissing the appellant's challenge.
The AT dismissed the appeal, affirming the attachment of properties under PMLA against the appellant, a public servant accused of possessing disproportionate assets. The tribunal held that the ED is not mandated to conduct an independent investigation into the predicate offence, as its role is limited to identifying any obvious flaws in the police/CBI investigation. The attachment complied with the conditions under the second proviso of Section 5(1), considering the appellant's failure to substantiate additional income and the risk of asset alienation. The contention that assets acquired from legal sources cannot be attached was rejected, as illicit funds can be laundered through legal channels. The ED's attachment was proportionate and limited to a fraction of the alleged disproportionate assets, with further attachments pending. The decision upheld the ED's authority and procedural compliance under PMLA, dismissing the appellant's challenge.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.