Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
The AAR held that 102 courses conducted by the applicant, approved by the Government of Kerala and forming part of the FYUGP curriculum under NEP 2020, are appropriately classified under SAC 999294 as "Other education and training services not elsewhere classified" and are eligible for GST exemption under Entry 66 of Notification 12/2017-CT (Rate). Courses purportedly approved by NCVET or funded by government/CSR lack sufficient documentation, precluding a definitive ruling; such services remain taxable unless falling under specific exemption entries. The applicant's claim for exemption under Entry 4, relating to municipal functions under Article 243W, was denied as imparting education is not a mandated municipal function under the Kerala Municipality Act. Consequently, the exemption applies only to the government-approved curriculum courses, and the applicant is liable to pay tax on other services lacking requisite approvals or documentary support.
The AAR held that 102 courses conducted by the applicant, approved by the Government of Kerala and forming part of the FYUGP curriculum under NEP 2020, are appropriately classified under SAC 999294 as "Other education and training services not elsewhere classified" and are eligible for GST exemption under Entry 66 of Notification 12/2017-CT (Rate). Courses purportedly approved by NCVET or funded by government/CSR lack sufficient documentation, precluding a definitive ruling; such services remain taxable unless falling under specific exemption entries. The applicant's claim for exemption under Entry 4, relating to municipal functions under Article 243W, was denied as imparting education is not a mandated municipal function under the Kerala Municipality Act. Consequently, the exemption applies only to the government-approved curriculum courses, and the applicant is liable to pay tax on other services lacking requisite approvals or documentary support.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
