Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
The AAR held that 102 courses conducted by the applicant, approved by the Government of Kerala and forming part of the FYUGP curriculum under NEP 2020, are appropriately classified under SAC 999294 as "Other education and training services not elsewhere classified" and are eligible for GST exemption under Entry 66 of Notification 12/2017-CT (Rate). Courses purportedly approved by NCVET or funded by government/CSR lack sufficient documentation, precluding a definitive ruling; such services remain taxable unless falling under specific exemption entries. The applicant's claim for exemption under Entry 4, relating to municipal functions under Article 243W, was denied as imparting education is not a mandated municipal function under the Kerala Municipality Act. Consequently, the exemption applies only to the government-approved curriculum courses, and the applicant is liable to pay tax on other services lacking requisite approvals or documentary support.
The AAR held that 102 courses conducted by the applicant, approved by the Government of Kerala and forming part of the FYUGP curriculum under NEP 2020, are appropriately classified under SAC 999294 as "Other education and training services not elsewhere classified" and are eligible for GST exemption under Entry 66 of Notification 12/2017-CT (Rate). Courses purportedly approved by NCVET or funded by government/CSR lack sufficient documentation, precluding a definitive ruling; such services remain taxable unless falling under specific exemption entries. The applicant's claim for exemption under Entry 4, relating to municipal functions under Article 243W, was denied as imparting education is not a mandated municipal function under the Kerala Municipality Act. Consequently, the exemption applies only to the government-approved curriculum courses, and the applicant is liable to pay tax on other services lacking requisite approvals or documentary support.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.